January 22nd, 2012 → 10:44 pm @ Dallas Black // No Comments
I am assuming you already know the definition but will go along with me for a refresher, the term “coital” is regarded by Merriam-Webster as a “physical union of male and female genitalia accompanied by rhythmic movements”. I have seen it used, more often than tolerable, in the form “post-coital” meaning essentially “after the act of sex.”
It is obvious and quite frankly, annoying.
I am not a 30 year veteran of erotic literature and I have never claimed to be however this is just one of a select group of words that suggest the author is either junior or simply lazy. I would much rather read “after we fucked” than “reminiscing in post-coital bliss”. Granted, I do not target the same audience as classic Harlequin romances but I do believe something has to be said for creativity and originality. My annoyance is not due to the assumption I enjoy more “modern, contemporary” prose. It is simply because the word is blatantly overused and often serves as a placeholder for an entire group of emotions that deserve much more thought and definition.
Can the term “coital” never be used? Is it impossible to use it in a clever, creative manner? No, it has its place. I just cannot point to an instance where the term has appeared and I haven’t rolled my eyes or had a genuine, clear understanding of what the author is attempting to portray.
In my opinion, words are like currency. Each word is valuable, expensive and the sum can be priceless.
In retrospect, I don’t care what you do, what words you use or in what order. All I ask, all I beg, is that when you decide to paint a picture of the vulnerable, sobering, conscious moments after sex that you pick your words selectively and in earnest.
That is all.
-Dallas
Author Dallas Black
dallas@erotictidbits.com
